Hi, one more question about the subpackage approach On 10/8/18 12:39 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: >> 2) ship example config file as real config file, with upstream's example >> config activated > > Ship this configuration in a subpackage (sshguard-iptables). Use rich > dependencies to have it auto-installed if iptables-services is installed. > >> 3) ship custom config file preconfigured for Fedora defaults > > Ship this configuration in a subpackage (sshguard-firewalld). Use rich > dependencies to have it auto-installed if firewalld is installed. This implies that the spec contains multiple /etc/sshguard.conf files. I can ship them as %doc sshguard.conf.<backend>, and then cp them to sshguard.conf during %post <subpackage>, but then no package would own that file, right? I can of course create separate packages with separate spec files for the config, but can this also be made to work with subpackages? Best, Christopher _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
