> libXScrnSaver is packaged in Fedora already. How do you think about to compare this approach with a specification from an other RPM-based software distribution? https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/openSUSE:Factory/libXScrnSaver/libXScrnSaver.spec?expand=1 How are the chances to use a package name like “libXss1” in more places? > PS. Obviously, English isn't your primary language This is true. > and there's a communication barrier here, Communication difficulties can often occur. > because I don't understand what you're trying to say at all. I am trying to check possibilities for name adjustments. > Please try to be clearer, maybe by phrasing your questions > in a different way. Would you like to help in consistent packaging of a software like “Jitsi Desktop 2.10”? http://lists.jitsi.org/pipermail/users/2017-February/012291.html > Real-time communications usually yield better results. I imagine that corresponding results would be different if the dialogue could be performed also with audio (and video). Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
