On Thursday, 16 February 2017 at 23:30, Markus Elfring wrote: > > Having a version in the package name should be used only in case > > of different parallel-installable major versions of the same software. > > How often would you like to support parallel installation before > a subsequent major version will become generally available? Why would we want to support parallel installation of something that isn't available? I don't understand the question. > > It would be nice if packages were named consistently across > > RPM-based distributions, but what's your point? > > How do you think about possible consequences around a package > name like “libXss1”? > https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/openSUSE:Factory/libXScrnSaver/libXScrnSaver.spec?expand=1 Again, I don't get your point at all. libXScrnSaver is packaged in Fedora already. PS. Obviously, English isn't your primary language and there's a communication barrier here, because I don't understand what you're trying to say at all. Please try to be clearer, maybe by phrasing your questions in a different way. Alternatively, you can come talk to us on IRC. Real-time communications usually yield better results. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
