Re: Does FPC have any policy about packaging when the upstream have chosen a deliberately offensive name for their application/library?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Does FPC have any policy about packaging when the upstream have chosen a deliberately offensive name for their application/library?
From: "Raphael Groner" <raphgro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 19:33:52 -0000
In-reply-to: <ufavb1ich3a.fsf@epithumia.math.uh.edu>
Reply-to: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: HyperKitty on https://lists.fedoraproject.org/

$ dnf search steam
…
python-fuckit …
python3-fuckit …

$ dnf search sex
…
libsexy …
libsexymm …
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- Re: Does FPC have any policy about packaging when the upstream have chosen a deliberately offensive name for their application/library?
  - From: Jason L Tibbitts III

Prev by Date: Re: Does FPC have any policy about packaging when the upstream have chosen a deliberately offensive name for their application/library?
Next by Date: Re: Does FPC have any policy about packaging when the upstream have chosen a deliberately offensive name for their application/library?
Previous by thread: Re: Does FPC have any policy about packaging when the upstream have chosen a deliberately offensive name for their application/library?
Next by thread: Re: Does FPC have any policy about packaging when the upstream have chosen a deliberately offensive name for their application/library?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite Forum] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux