On Seg, 2016-03-14 at 08:54 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 03/13/2016 08:12 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 9:15 PM, David Timms <dtimms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, I've worked out what seemed to be a correct URL for for > > > rakarrack > > > spec, now that it is accessed via git within the sf website: > > > > > > I couldn't work out how to fit the sourceforce git URLs from: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.ne > > > t > > > or > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Git_Hosting_Se > > > rvices > > > > > > to suit. Any ideas for a standard way to handle sf git snapshots > > > ? > > Move them to github. Seriously. Sourceforge has been playing > > various > > games to avoid accessing content without going through their > > adveritising functions since they were first founded, and I've > > found > > no reason to work with any project hosted there > > since..... checking > > old notes, not since 2009. Devshare (I think it is called devshare) was a mistake and only happens on windows, and all the fault can't be impute to sf.net. sf.net was and still is an important organization that support open source and free software . > Just to let people know: > > https://sourceforge.net/blog/sourceforge-acquisition-and-future-plans > / > -- Sérgio M. B. -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
