On 03/13/2016 08:12 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 9:15 PM, David Timms <dtimms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi, I've worked out what seemed to be a correct URL for for rakarrack >> spec, now that it is accessed via git within the sf website: >> >> I couldn't work out how to fit the sourceforce git URLs from: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.net >> or >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Git_Hosting_Services >> >> to suit. Any ideas for a standard way to handle sf git snapshots ? > > Move them to github. Seriously. Sourceforge has been playing various > games to avoid accessing content without going through their > adveritising functions since they were first founded, and I've found > no reason to work with any project hosted there since..... checking > old notes, not since 2009. Just to let people know: https://sourceforge.net/blog/sourceforge-acquisition-and-future-plans/ -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxx Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
