Il 12/07/2015 01:20, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ha scritto: > On Saturday, 11 July 2015 at 18:25, Germano Massullo wrote: >> Reply from Pascal, one of the Darktable upstream developers >> http://redmine.darktable.org/issues/10582#note-5 > Thanks. What I don't understand is why they're so opposed to the shared > library idea. Why is camera support application-specific? For all other readers: answer has been posted here just a few hours ago https://github.com/klauspost/rawspeed/issues/109#issuecomment-120668893 Dominik, your statement in github comment: <<a temporary (let's say 2 Fedora releases ~= 1 year) bundling exception could get a majority vote in favour. The issue would be revisited in 1 year and we would see where the three projects stand.>> does it mean: - Fedora Packaging Committee will consider again the question next year and meanwhile the main mantainer and I have to stop releasing further Darktable updates; or - did you simply wanted to tell Darktable and Rawspeed developers that every year the Fedora Packaging Committee has to verify again if there are the conditions for an exception ? -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
