Hi, On Friday, 10 July 2015 at 09:35, Germano Massullo wrote: > Hi, I am Caterpillar, yesterday we were speaking about Darktable and > Rawspeed on Freenode. > I have a question: if Darktable's Rawspeed fork will be accepted to be > included in Fedora's repos, would it be possible to call it > "darktable-rawspeed" to distinguish and divide it from upstream Rawspeed? Well, ideally there should be just one canonical version of Rawspeed and it should come from the canonical upstream. Using a fork is allowed if original upstream is dead or unresponsive to bug reports, if it's compatible and if other projects have switched to it as well. I have provided some comments in your issue report on rawspeed's github: https://github.com/klauspost/rawspeed/issues/109 Could you please do the same in your report on darktable's redmine? I don't have an account there. http://redmine.darktable.org/issues/10582 Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
