Hi, On Sex, 2015-07-10 at 12:48 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hi, > > On Friday, 10 July 2015 at 09:35, Germano Massullo wrote: > > Hi, I am Caterpillar, yesterday we were speaking about Darktable and > > Rawspeed on Freenode. > > I have a question: if Darktable's Rawspeed fork will be accepted to be > > included in Fedora's repos, would it be possible to call it > > "darktable-rawspeed" to distinguish and divide it from upstream Rawspeed? > > Well, ideally there should be just one canonical version of Rawspeed and > it should come from the canonical upstream. Using a fork is allowed if > original upstream is dead or unresponsive to bug reports, if it's > compatible and if other projects have switched to it as well. FYI rawstudio bundles rawspeed , because rawspeed isn't available on Fedora , but upstream of rawspeed is not dead [1] One of my goals was update rawspeed [2] on rawstudio , maybe the best was packaging rawspeed or a fork I don't know . I can help on a package review ... [1] https://github.com/klauspost/rawspeed [2] https://github.com/rawstudio/rawstudio/issues/5 > I have provided some comments in your issue report on rawspeed's github: > https://github.com/klauspost/rawspeed/issues/109 > > Could you please do the same in your report on darktable's redmine? I > don't have an account there. > http://redmine.darktable.org/issues/10582 > > Regards, > Dominik Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
