Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 12:06:30AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > > When the maintainer Martin Stransky submitted the update he could > > have chosen to set the stable karma threshold to 1 or 2. Then the > > process of pushing the update to stable would have started > > automatically as soon as the critical path requirement was > > fulfilled. But since Martin left the > > That's not necessarily good either. A bad update intended to fix a > critical security problem can be worse than the issue it was meant to > fix. To be clear, I didn't say that it would have been good. I merely explained that it was Martin's choice, not a policy. Björn Persson
Attachment:
pgpsj5MZeER5O.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
