Re: critical path security update policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Since you have a clearer understanding of these things, would you care to take the time to explain why the update is still in testing and why the fact that it remains there is unrelated to any Fedora policy?
 
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 at 10:32 PM
From: "Björn Persson" <Bjorn@rombobjörn.se>
To: packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: critical path security update policy
Jerry Bratton wrote:
> "It must first reach a karma of 2, consisting of 0 positive karma
> from proventesters, along with 2 additional karma from the
> community."
>
> While the update has a karma of 2, only one of those is
> from the community (the other being from proventesters). My
> understanding is that the policy requiring 2 karma from the community
> is currently what's keeping the update in testing.

You think proventesters aren't part of the community?

Did you notice the message "Critical path update approved", dated two
seconds after the second karma point? That message says that the
requirement has been fulfilled.

Björn Persson
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux