On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 12:06:30AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > When the maintainer Martin Stransky submitted the update he could have > chosen to set the stable karma threshold to 1 or 2. Then the process of > pushing the update to stable would have started automatically as soon as > the critical path requirement was fulfilled. But since Martin left the That's not necessarily good either. A bad update intended to fix a critical security problem can be worse than the issue it was meant to fix. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
