On Sat, 31 May 2014 00:31:50 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > As of 2014, I only know two cases where clang is still better: more complete > caret diagnostics, and better recovery from invalid types (clang provides > suggestions and uses it for the rest of the compilation to avoid cascaded > error messages). wrong caret / lineno for wrong ctor field initializer http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59621 diagnostics: missing proper file:line on C++ compilation error http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58589 Jan -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
