Why don't we write in guidelines that BR: perl is mandatory for perl packages?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,
    I have a discussion going on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979677 where my basis of discussion is that "BR: perl is mandatory" is not written in any guidelines. Technically, I can understand what perl people there are trying to tell me.
    So, question is why is it so hard to write in perl guidelines that perl packages should BR: perl?

Regards,
Parag.
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux