Re: Binary in libxxx package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Binary in libxxx package
From: Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:19:34 +0800
Delivered-to: packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAHcXnBGucSXD4iWXitRt5F6nzvXM1fQdS_5B6dmrAV=236YU1A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHcXnBHJo2tWf+eqGXVJcegsSxS_q99WoBhPK0-D-ObkojbQhQ@mail.gmail.com> <kse9mn$ksl$1@ger.gmane.org> <20130720152710.GA23183@disco.bu.edu> <CAHcXnBGucSXD4iWXitRt5F6nzvXM1fQdS_5B6dmrAV=236YU1A@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Any solutions?

Thanks again.
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

References:
- Binary in libxxx package
  - From: Christopher Meng
- Re: Binary in libxxx package
  - From: Rex Dieter
- Re: Binary in libxxx package
  - From: Matthew Miller
- Re: Binary in libxxx package
  - From: Christopher Meng

Prev by Date: Re: Binary in libxxx package
Next by Date: Re: Binary in libxxx package
Previous by thread: Re: Binary in libxxx package
Next by thread: Re: Binary in libxxx package
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite Forum] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux