On 01/30/2012 01:31 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 29.01.2012, 23:38 -0500 schrieb Jon Stanley: >> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Christoph Wickert >> <christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> I wonder if this rule is still needed. I know I'd loose backward >>> compatibility with older rpm versions, but I don't want make a >> >> I agree that a -common subpackage is silly for this, but are any of >> the RPM versions that this *wouldn't* work with still in supported >> releases? > > Not in Fedora. > >> The only one I'd be concerned with is RHEL5, but I think even that >> works right, no? > > I haven't tested it, but based on my experience with multi-arch file > conflicts I *guess* it will not work on RHEL 5. > But RHEL 5 shouldn't really get gtk3 packages anyway, right? Regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/ Email: salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | GPG key ID: A36A937A Jabber: hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | IRC: hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
