> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:25:18 -0500 > James Antill <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> ...so this seems it's all up in the air, right? Is there any reason we >> can't/shouldn't wait for next week, given that it isn't approved? > > Well, looking at it sooner rather than later might be nice for the > feature owners. I asked them to not do anything until things are all > set for scope. > >> > notting voted on the fesco ticket in such a way that it's unclear >> > whether he was +1 or -1 to the feature as written. >> >> Would it pass with +5/-4 ? > > Yes. FESCo uses simple majority. > >> > If notting can reply before the FPC meeting, I've asked nirik to >> > open up an FPC ticket for whether we'll reject that as written as >> > we did in the preliminary look. >> > >> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove >> >> Also ... if FESCO passes it as-is ... what would we reject? Just the >> sbin changes? Can we do that? > > I'd rather avoid the 'who can override who' discussion. ;) > > Speaking for myself (a member of fesco) but not fesco, I would really > like to hear from FPC those parts that they feel are not in Fedora's > best interests. FESCo empowered the FPC to handle those issues, so > IMHO, we should let FPC review and let us know what parts we should > drop from the scope or re-work. > > I would hope that FESCo would see those concerns and ask the feature > owners to adjust their feature to match. I may or may not make the meeting due to $_DAYJOB. -J > kevin > -- > packaging mailing list > packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
