On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 14:35 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 03:25:25PM -0500, Tom Callaway wrote: > > ... since I'm not going to be there, due to an unavoidable conflict. > > > > Sorry folks, but as of right now, we didn't have any pending tickets, so > > it would have been a short meeting. :) > > > > Lets just meet again on Nov 23, or, if something urgent comes up in the > > interim, feel free to meet without me (assuming that you have quorum). > > > Note -- there is potentially a big question -- fesco voted on UsrMove today > +4,-4 leaving in the bin => sbin merge that we said was contrary to > Guidelines. * #690 F17 Feature: move all to /usr https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove (nirik, 18:19:50) * ACTION: : -4 votes, +4 votes, feature owners will consult with remaining fesco member in ticket. (nirik, 18:41:38) * ACTION: nirik to file FPC ticket for looking over things vs guidelines. (nirik, 18:41:55) ...so this seems it's all up in the air, right? Is there any reason we can't/shouldn't wait for next week, given that it isn't approved? > notting voted on the fesco ticket in such a way that it's unclear whether he > was +1 or -1 to the feature as written. Would it pass with +5/-4 ? > If notting can reply before the FPC meeting, I've asked nirik to open up an > FPC ticket for whether we'll reject that as written as we did in the > preliminary look. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove Also ... if FESCO passes it as-is ... what would we reject? Just the sbin changes? Can we do that? -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
