On 10/13/2011 09:38 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 09:10 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> At least I do not want to this list to become a newbie forum nor "yet >> another source" of review spam. > > Well, if you consider tibbs, rex, sochotnicky or toshio (people who have > mentionned to be interested in the SIG) to be newbie then I guess we are > not welcome. Except of you and sochotnicky, I know all of them. > If you do not consider them to be newbie then I would > invite you to read again what's the idea behind this SIG. Yes, may-be I should read it for the n-th time. Openly said, I don't see much sense in such a SIG, but I didn't want to take away your favorite toy. >> You might not want to hear this, but to me personally, the chatter and >> the bureaucrazy's (typo intended) noise on package-review@ already is >> beyond "being bearable". > > Again, we do not want to duplicate/replicate/have anything in common > with package-review@. > > Or you have to tell me how I can try to be more clear. So ... what do you want to do? Problems within a review belong into the review, general/fundamental problems belong on this list rsp. in front of the FPC, ... I don't understand hat are you aiming at, except that you are intending to implement the (n+1)th body in fedora. Ralf -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
