Re: Package review SIG dead?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:35:28PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "AG" == Andy Grimm <agrimm@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> AG> I don't think there's any need to send email for every review; I
> AG> wouldn't want that on any list.
> 
> Well, actually, all of that traffic is already on a list (the
> package-review list).  I subscribe and there were times when I actually
> read all of the traffic there.
> 
> Anyway, I've gone back and forth about using this list or -devel.  I'd
> hate to have "yet another list (TM)" but I'd hate to annoy anyone (and
> trying to do things in -devel is mostly pointless).
> 
> So maybe start here and move to a separate list of the volume becomes
> too high?
> 
+1. I've not yet summoned the time to participate in the Package Review SIG
and I don't see a  problem with sharing this list for now.  Likely, the
questions that arise around package review would end up on this list anyhow.

-Toshio

Attachment: pgpbr8V_JxW1n.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux