On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 21:30 +0000, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote: > I have seen some of the GNOME Shell extensions in the repos with the > names gnome-shell-extensions and others with gnome-shell-extension. A > naming standard should be established, I would suggest that each > package contains a single extension, so the name sans "s" would be > most correct. In the future if a meta package was created to be > calling multiple extensions then "extensions" would be more correct. Some reviewers already tried to harmonize this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710386#c1 Using this approach: """ These extensions were built as subpackages of the main package "gnome-shell-extensions", and so named "gnome-shell-extensions-<foo>", as defined in the guidelines. It seemed logical to me to refer to "third-party" extensions under the name "gnome-shell-extension-<bar>", since the package would provide only one extension "a priori". Maybe we'll need to specify guidelines for such extensions, becoming more numerous. """ (see comment 3 of the same bug report). This sounds like a valid approach to me. Regards, Pierre -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
