On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 02:28:58PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 13:02:12 +0300, VS wrote: > > > For example if you install foo.i686 first, then later foo.x86_64: > > at the time foo.x86_64's %post runs, $1 will be 2 in it even if nothing > > is actually being upgraded. > > Doesn't that break arch-specific scripts like the following? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GIO_modules > > | %postun > | gio-querymodules-%{__isa_bits} %{_libdir}/gio/modules &> /dev/null || : > | > | %post > | if [ $1 -eq 1 ] ; then > | # For upgrades, the cache will be regenerated by the new package's %postun > | gio-querymodules-%{__isa_bits} %{_libdir}/gio/modules || : > | fi > > %post for the x86_64 would not refresh the cache, because $1 -eq 1 is false. > Is there a %postun call for the old pkg (i.e. the i686 pkg)? If so, that > %postun would refresh the wrong cache due to %_libdir. > Or is there no %postun call because the install is not an upgrade? > Then the cache would not be refreshed at all for the x86_64 install. > Filed: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/81 -Toshio
Attachment:
pgptAW1ByQFVx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
