On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:46:31AM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > By the way, there are two things that could be improved in that section: > > 1) Typo: s/package upgrade form/package upgrade from/ > > 2) It notes that the arguments will vary with parallel installable > packages such as the kernel. It would be good to note that in addition > to kernel this occurs also when multiple arch versions of the same > package is installed which is a common scenario on x86_64 systems, which > means simply testing for $1 to find out if something is being upgraded > or installed initially or removed may be dangerous, depending on the > case. For example if you install foo.i686 first, then later foo.x86_64: > at the time foo.x86_64's %post runs, $1 will be 2 in it even if nothing > is actually being upgraded. > Updated. See if it's satisfactory now. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Syntax -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpMgYoHlqk97.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
