Re: Review Guidelines missing entry

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le samedi 13 juin 2009 à 11:27 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> Le vendredi 12 juin 2009 à 17:03 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
> 
> > We don't have any of the Application Specific Guidelines listed there so
> > not listing a font checklist item is consistent:
> 
> Please review FPC deliberations at the time
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Minutes/20090203#t11:29

Clarified here
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Minutes/20090217#t11:23

You're "adding to the sea of rules" and a "type-specific
guideline" (library)

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux