Re: Review Guidelines missing entry

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le vendredi 12 juin 2009 à 10:32 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : 
> I just noticed that although checking for static libraries is listed on:
>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines
> 
> Checking for Bundled libraries isn't:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries
> 
> I'm going to add that as it's just a clarification rather than a change
> in Guidelines.  If someone objects, holler and I can revert until the
> next FPC meeting.

Since adding a line to check for fonts and apply corresponding
guidelines was refused on the ground that the review check list is
already too long, and reviewers should know packaging guidelines, I
object to this addition.

Please be consistent.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux