* Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> [2009-05-09 13:25]: > Jussi Lehtola wrote: > > > > there seems to be an inconsistency with the Java guidelines: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Jar_file_naming states that > > if the package only contains a single .jar file it should have the same > > name as the package, but the ant and maven spec file templates > > install .jar files as > > > > cp -p [build path to jar] \ > > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version}.jar > > > I would lean towards Java#Jar_file_naming being clarified but I'm not a > java guy. Andrew, Fernando, Deepak, someone want to write up a > clarification of this? Sure, I'll speak about this with Deepak and others and get something written up. > > Also, I find it a bit inconsistent that java packages don't have to have > > a java- prefix as python, perl, php and so on packages have to. > > I do to but I think this is the standard for enough packages that we > shouldn't look at fixing it unless it's causing breakage. Agreed. Most (all?) of this stuff came from JPackage and there's little point in breaking compatibility/naming. Andrew -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
