Jussi Lehtola wrote: > Hi, > > > there seems to be an inconsistency with the Java guidelines: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Jar_file_naming states that > if the package only contains a single .jar file it should have the same > name as the package, but the ant and maven spec file templates > install .jar files as > > cp -p [build path to jar] \ > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version}.jar > I would lean towards Java#Jar_file_naming being clarified but I'm not a java guy. Andrew, Fernando, Deepak, someone want to write up a clarification of this? > > Also, I find it a bit inconsistent that java packages don't have to have > a java- prefix as python, perl, php and so on packages have to. I do to but I think this is the standard for enough packages that we shouldn't look at fixing it unless it's causing breakage. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
