Re: Re: Macro question for rpm gurus

[Gagadget <gagadget@xxxxxxxxx>]

2009/5/4 Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Gagadget <gagadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> %define VERSION 9.6.0
> %define PATCHVER 1
> [ ... ]
> %if %{PATCHVER}
> Source0:
> ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/%{VERSION}-P%{PATCHVER}/bind-%{VERSION}-P%{PATCHVER}.tar.gz
> %else
> Source0:
> ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/%{VERSION}/bind-%{VERSION}.tar.gz
> %endif
>
> It works, but I'd like to know if there is a more recursive way to avoid
> if/else ? Using "?" macro or something like that ?

%global XVER      %VERSION%{?PATCHVER:-P%PATCHVER}
Source0:          ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/%XVER/bind-%XVER.tar.gz

and do not define 'PATCHVER 0'

Thank you, here is what I did :

%define VERSION 9.6.0
%define PATCHVER 1
%define DISTVER mylocaldist
%define PKGVER 1
[...]
Version:        %{VERSION}
Release:        %{?PATCHVER:P%PATCHVER.}%{DISTVER}.%{PKGVER}
[...]
Source0:        ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/%{VERSION}%{?PATCHVER:-P%PATCHVER}/bind-%{VERSION}%{?PATCHVER:-P%PATCHVER}.tar.gz
[...]
%prep
%setup -q -n %{name}-%{VERSION}%{?PATCHVER:-P%PATCHVER}

I can't define a BINDVER or XVER because I want to have the Patchlevel in the Release tag, and it refuse the "-". With the above, my rpm is named bind-9.6.0-P1.mylocaldist.1

One question :

If i do
# %define PATCHVER 1

The PATCHVER is still define, I have to delete it to get it work ??? Is it normal ?

Enrico

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging