Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Jeu 22 janvier 2009 00:53, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
This discussion has ranged far afield of the original post.
So, does anyone know of a reason to keep the dos2unix warning?
Is there anything dos2unix does which can not be done by standard
tools like sed?
for txt in *.txt ; do
iconv -f WINDOWS-1252 -t UTF-8 -o $txt.1 $txt
fold -s $txt.1 > $txt.2
sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.2
touch -r $txt $txt.2
mv $txt.2 $txt
rm $txt.1
done
I don't know of any.
The whole point is to replace those 8 confusing lines of scripting with
a simple call. It makes the spec file easier to read.
But we shouldn't be telling people they must not
use dos2unix (with a proper BuildRequires) if there's no actual problem.
+1
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
