Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le Jeu 22 janvier 2009 00:53, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : > >> This discussion has ranged far afield of the original post. >> >> So, does anyone know of a reason to keep the dos2unix warning? > > Is there anything dos2unix does which can not be done by standard > tools like sed? > > for txt in *.txt ; do > iconv -f WINDOWS-1252 -t UTF-8 -o $txt.1 $txt > fold -s $txt.1 > $txt.2 > sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.2 > touch -r $txt $txt.2 > mv $txt.2 $txt > rm $txt.1 > done > I don't know of any. But we shouldn't be telling people they must not use dos2unix (with a proper BuildRequires) if there's no actual problem. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
