On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 01:34:55PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > Maybe there isn't a general case conclusion to draw but it sounds like > treating help as an optional feature is what was decided for at least > the desktop-team's subset of packages. We didn't generate any Indeed, and I remember there were some bugs filled. But the thread shows that there was no consensus, and, for example, I kept yelp as a gnochm dependency, considering that having a help window that comes when clicking on help wasn't optional, and that the bloat wasn't too important given that it already was a gnome app. That being said, I orphaned gnochm, so everybody is free to remove yelp :) # repoquery --whatrequires yelp gtranslator-0:1.1.7-9.fc10.i386 gnomesword-0:2.4.1-1.fc10.i386 gnochm-0:0.9.11-2.fc9.noarch lat-0:1.2.3-4.fc10.i386 conglomerate-0:0.9.1-5.fc9.i386 gnucash-docs-0:2.2.0-2.fc8.noarch gnomesword-0:2.4.0-1.fc10.i386 -- Pat -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
