Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:01:09PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> Oops... I found the mailing list thread and there was a conclusion. >> Packages should not require yelp. Instead, packages that fail silently > > That was not my conclusion. My conclusion was that it was up to the > packager. > Well... https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-June/msg01522.html Maybe there isn't a general case conclusion to draw but it sounds like treating help as an optional feature is what was decided for at least the desktop-team's subset of packages. We didn't generate any Guidelines out of that discussion so the package probably isn't going to raise any flags at review time. > This doesn't change that your conclusion holds: > >> So it seems like filesystem owning /usr/share/gnome/help would be the >> best so that we don't need to have every package own /usr/share/gnome/help. > <nod> -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
