Re: Ownership of /usr/share/gnome/help

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>> "TK" == Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> TTK> yelp owns it.  There's a question of whether packages which have
> TK> gnome help should Require yelp or not.  I think it's a bug if a
> TK> package has a help menu that doesn't work so I lean towards
> TK> requiring it.
> 
> For one reference, see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243408 which would tend to
> indicate that yelp should not generally be a dependency of packages
> which have gnome help
> 

Oops... I found the mailing list thread and there was a conclusion.
Packages should not require yelp.  Instead, packages that fail silently
when yelp is not installed need a bug to print the error dialog returned
from the gnome API.

So it seems like filesystem owning /usr/share/gnome/help would be the
best so that we don't need to have every package own /usr/share/gnome/help.

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux