Mamoru Tasaka wrote, at 11/07/2008 02:26 AM +9:00: > David Lutterkort wrote, at 11/07/2008 01:27 AM +9:00: >> Yes, that makes perfect sense, and should be required for gem and >> non-gem packages in the same way. >> >> David > > Thank you. Again I updated my proposition wiki with reflecting your comment. > I think the current contents can be included in the formal packaging guidelines. > (The URL is still: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka/PackagingDrafts/RubyGem_with_C_code ) I moved the wiki to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/RubyGem_with_C_code (old URL will be redirected) and added this to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DraftsTodo Regards, Mamoru -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging