Thank you again.
David Lutterkort wrote, at 11/06/2008 12:09 PM +9:00:
> On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 19:46 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
>> David Lutterkort wrote, at 11/04/2008 04:04 AM +9:00:
>>> * Is the example snippet from a spec file meant only for gems with
>>> extension libraries or for all gems ?
>> - Currently only with extention libraries.
>> If rpm created from gem file is completely noarch, gem file can be installed
>> under %{buildroot}%{gemdir} directly.
>> (However, of course, there is no problem if we first install gem files
>> under %{_builddir} first even if it is noarch)
>
> Agreed. Ultimately, it would be nice to support more of this with some
> stock macros; but that has nothing to do with your proposal.
Currently I have no idea about what macros can be defined here, however
for now I think we can think of this later.
> The proposal looks really good - +1 from me.
Thank you!
One more issue:
I found that even for non-Gem packages many packages use "extconf.rb"
to create C library, and in such case "export CONFIGURE_ARGS=..." method
can also be applied.
So I wrote another proposal to use this method even for non-Gem ruby packages
(on the last of :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka/PackagingDrafts/RubyGem_with_C_code
)
I would want to know how you would think about this.
Regards,
Mamoru
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
