Re: README.Dist is preferrable to README.Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:12:06AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "PD" == Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> PD> Are these files really fedora specific, or package specific?
> 
> In the case of my packages, or packages where I have recommended the
> use of README.Fedora, they indicate specific information on how Fedora
> has provided default configurations and any Fedora-specific setup
> necessary (such as indicating that a web application has installed an
> apache config file restricting access to localhost until default
> passwords are changed).

But is it fedora specific, or specific to the setup of the package? In
most case it is linked with how the package is done, but not to fedora,
otherwise said doesn't use any of the fedora specificities. Your example
doesn't seems to use anything fedora specific.

--
Pat

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux