Re: README.Dist is preferrable to README.Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: README.Dist is preferrable to README.Fedora
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 25 Oct 2008 15:21:22 -0500
In-reply-to: <20081025134755.GF2608@xxxxxxx>
References: <20081025134755.GF2608@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4

>>>>> "PD" == Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> writes:

PD> I suggest changing README.Fedora to README.Dist

I disagree.  README.Fedora is a fine name, and is what I always
recommend in review.

 - J<

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

Follow-Ups:
- Re: README.Dist is preferrable to README.Fedora
  - From: Patrice Dumas

References:
- README.Dist is preferrable to README.Fedora
  - From: Patrice Dumas

Prev by Date: Re: README.Dist is preferrable to README.Fedora
Next by Date: Re: README.Dist is preferrable to README.Fedora
Previous by thread: Re: README.Dist is preferrable to README.Fedora
Next by thread: Re: README.Dist is preferrable to README.Fedora
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite Forum] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux