>>>>> "PD" == Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> writes: PD> Are these files really fedora specific, or package specific? In the case of my packages, or packages where I have recommended the use of README.Fedora, they indicate specific information on how Fedora has provided default configurations and any Fedora-specific setup necessary (such as indicating that a web application has installed an apache config file restricting access to localhost until default passwords are changed). PD> In most cases they are package specific, so I think the file name PD> should reflect that, and also it helps others (or EPEL) reuse spec PD> files. EPEL is a Fedora product, is it not? If someone wants to lift a Fedora package and has concerns about such files appearing in it, they are welcome to rename them. That's not my business, though. If someone wants to propose a standard macro which expands to "Fedora", "EPEL" or whatever a hypothetical Fedora-consuming distro might wish, then I would happily use it. - J< -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
