On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:53:42 +0200 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 25.10.2008 15:47, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > > In > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Summary_and_description > > > > I suggest changing README.Fedora to README.Dist, see for an > > argumentation: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Avoiding_using_fedora_or_redhat > > I really appreciate the general idea, but I don't like the term > ".Dist" to much, as it is a bit misleading imho: some people might > think that file might contain "informations relevant for distribution > of the package". > > I thought about a alternative, but all my mind came up with was > "distribution-specific-notes" -- that has the same problem as noted > above, but it's imho not that worse. But that filename is quite > long :-/ > > Maybe somebody else comes up with something that is shorter and more > accurate... I tend to use "README.RPM" or some variant thereof (e.g. README-SELinux.RPM). Paul. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
