On 25.10.2008 15:47, Patrice Dumas wrote:
In http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Summary_and_description I suggest changing README.Fedora to README.Dist, see for an argumentation: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Avoiding_using_fedora_or_redhat
I really appreciate the general idea, but I don't like the term ".Dist" to much, as it is a bit misleading imho: some people might think that file might contain "informations relevant for distribution of the package".
I thought about a alternative, but all my mind came up with was "distribution-specific-notes" -- that has the same problem as noted above, but it's imho not that worse. But that filename is quite long :-/
Maybe somebody else comes up with something that is shorter and more accurate...
CU knurd -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
