I was working on bug 452636 (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 ), and reached an
impasse.
One of my last reviews (from Joe Orton) said:
non-formal review:
> >
> > 4) Source: http://apache.webthing.com/mod_proxy_html/mod_proxy_html.tgz
> > is bad - do upstream not provide versioned URLs?
>
> Unfortunately, they do not.
upstream should be educated then ;)
You'll need to work around that and version the tarball manually, I think this
is covered in the wiki somewhere.
Well, I've (a) tried to get the owners to rename the tarball with an
embedded version number, so far without success, and (b) went looking
through the maintainers wiki on how to handle cases where the tarball
isn't versioned (and it must be done manually) but didn't find it.
Can someone point me in the correct direction?
Thanks,
-Philip
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
