>>>>> "PP" == Philip Prindeville <philipp_subx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: PP> Well, I've (a) tried to get the owners to rename the tarball with PP> an embedded version number, so far without success, and (b) went PP> looking through the maintainers wiki on how to handle cases where PP> the tarball isn't versioned (and it must be done manually) but PP> didn't find it. You just deal with it the hard way. CVS (or the sources mechanism, at least) has no problems dealing with unversioned upstream source. The burden on the packager is higher but it's not really all that difficult to deal with. It does make upstream source comparisons mostly useless, though, so we lose an important means of verification but this isn't something the maintainer can solve. If you asked upstream and they don't care then you've done what you can do. - J< -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
