> If we're using cabal-rpm for packaging > then we really don't need to add rpm macros IMHO. I am very much in favor of having good set of base macros (under /etc/rpm/). I have developed some simple rpms using the macros posted by Yaakov and Jens (which needed to be tweaked a bit), and was quite happy with the results. I will share those in the following email. -Rajesh On 2008-08-28-Thu 12:23:11 am Jens Petersen wrote: > Hi, > > Bryan O'Sullivan さんは書きました: > > Frankly, I think that the current version of the guidelines is fine. > > It's much better to have something not quite perfect where we can make > > progress than to be permanently stuck. So moving forwards with what we > > have suits me. > > I finally took a deep look at cabal-rpm (never actually used it > before!;) and realised that that is largely the source of all my > problems with the current guidelines... > > Below is a patch against darcs head which backports most of my changes > to the guidelines to cabal-rpm. If we're using cabal-rpm for packaging > then we really don't need to add rpm macros IMHO. > > Thanks for all the comments. > > Jens -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
