Re: OCaml library packaging - no-arch for non-devel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 02:05:41PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 18:55 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > If you can suggest a way to write a spec file so that the main package
> > is noarch and subpackages are arch-dependent, please let us know.
> 
> Not really possible without having the buildsystem do multiple passes
> (like kernel), which we really want to avoid.

Maybe a feature request for rpm 4.7? E.g. BuildArch per %package?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpLfVQxuMSCk.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux