On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 01:33:30PM -0400, Alan Dunn wrote: > Does anyone know whether OCaml library main packages (non-devel > packages) should be packaged as no-arch, since they only contain > bytecode files, which should be architecture independent? For the main package in _libraries_ (not programs, obviously) you're right. The only reason we don't do this is that RPM doesn't make it possible to do :-( If you can suggest a way to write a spec file so that the main package is noarch and subpackages are arch-dependent, please let us know. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
