Does anyone know whether OCaml library main packages (non-devel packages) should be packaged as no-arch, since they only contain bytecode files, which should be architecture independent? It seems that convention (by looking at the list of available OCaml libraries) is to make them architecture dependent (that is, just have a version for each architecture even though there shouldn't be architecture dependent contents), though rpmlint complains. It seems that Debian's policy (http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/ocaml_packaging_policy.txt), from which one might've been tempted to draw suggestions, is to include the native code files in the main library package, which is not done for Fedora. (This also doesn't seem to be addressed in the Fedora OCaml packaging guidelines either.) Is this something that just should be done but often isn't, or did I miss something else? - Alan -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
