On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 11:19:30AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 11:02:31AM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > > OK, I see the point now. I had assumed -- wrongly -- that the hash of > > a.cmo would change in this case, but it does not. So we need a > > version of ocamlobjinfo which can handle *.cmx files as well. > > Right, that's our issue to. Maybe now we are two different large > distribution we have more power to go and ask INRIA for this? > > Julien: can you refresh our memory about the tool (IIRC) you spotted in > the OCaml sources able to extract info from *.cmx files? > > > There is another problem with ocamlobjinfo too. See: > > http://groups.google.co.uk/group/fa.caml/msg/f2c3e9e8cfa628b3?hl=en&; > > > > In Fedora we have avoided this by having a list of modules in the > > standard library which we just ignore (Asttypes, Outcometree and > > Cmo_format so far). > > Ok, maybe we can keep it on a shared wiki page to ease of maintenance? Yup, I don't mind. Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
