I wonder whether this is maybe overdesigned. AFAIU this signature hashing was made because ocaml is not considered stable enough to carry over signatures from release to release. Same could be told about hundreds of C libraries, wouldn't the neccessity in ocaml then imply a neccessity to hash C-library APIs as well? Maybe it's something we will consider to do someday, but the order would be to cater for C/C++/Fortran/etc libraries first and then for niche languages like ocaml. I think it's a bit too much, or did I miss something important (I'm not a real ocaml user, there is just this one application that even justifies ocaml's existance ;) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgppBEhDtFVuP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
