On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 20:27 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > That's a different story, we can't chose that number, that's given by > the FHS. I know, it's a different (sad) story. > > To be honest I think the username should always be configurable and > > configuration be made by a config script run by the admin so that the > > admin can take a conscious decision, but we are stuck with the fact that > > rpm "owns" file (-V) and that it can't be interactive. > > You mean to choose at installtion time that httpd is not using the > user apache but say Donald? What about all the other packages that > make their bits owned by apache then? How would these packages know > what the base package is using for users and groups? The package need to provide this information, it's not difficult to do, just put the user in a config file (you have to anyway) so that the other packages can see it. Simo. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
