On 6/14/07, Simo Sorce <ssorce@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 17:25 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:40:16AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 10:19 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:45:27PM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Axel, you couldn't choose a worst example :)
Ok having had to tell people that they can't have the accounts root, bin, sys or daemon just because thats their first or last name... if there is an account name.. it will be used in the real world (god knows how many people in boston or berkeley have changed their names to Xyzzy. There is no good solution for figuring out what a person's local naming/UID scheme is. We can try and come up with lots of ways.. and too many sites will have a name/number scheme that we will break horribly. We might as well prepopulate the /etc/passwd and /etc/group file with 100,200,500,etc unused accounts with the names of "uid001/gid001" etc And then either work out a cross distribution committee that works out what future UID/GID should be for the billion odd packages are. Works as well as any other scheme from what I can tell. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
